Maidstone and the Weald Liberal Democrats

Lib Dems Campaign to "Save our Swifts"

12.39.00pm BST (GMT +0100) Mon 5th Oct 2009

Swifts in flight

Maidstone’s Lib Dems say it’s time to save our swifts

In light of the recorded rapid decline in the UK swift population (a recent RSPB survey showed a decline of more than a quarter since 2004, which is put down to to renovation and modernisation of Victorian and Edwardian properties). Maidstone Lib Dem Councillors have called for the adoption of a policy whereby all new developments and extensions within recorded swift hotspots across Maidstone Borough incorporate "swift brick" nesting facilities. Such a progressive policy could perhaps arrest the local decline in populations of this enigmatic bird of "conservation concern".

Nesting populations of swift can be found in Fant Ward, within the town areas of East and North Wards, the All Saints Church area of High Street Ward and in Headcorn, Lenham, Ulcombe and Marden village centres. A population also formerly nested at Maidstone Museum.

Lib Dem Shadow Cabinet Member for Regeneration Tony Harwood states: "Such a simple but progressive policy would comply with the Council's legal duty to 'have regard' for biodiversity under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006. Significantly, architect Lord Rogers utilises swift bricks within many of his projects. A number of companies market a range of designs of "swift brick" from as little as £30 each".

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook LibDigLibDig redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story
Comment on this news story
Previous news story: FANT-astic win for Lib Dems in Fant By-election (Fri 2nd Oct 2009).
Next news story: Wildlife Haven Flourishes at Sandling Park (Thu 8th Oct 2009).

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 98 Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BY.
Published and promoted by Season Prater on behalf of Peter Carroll and the Maidstone Lib Dems. All at 56 Bower Mount Road, Maidstone ME16 5AU
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.